<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Latest Casualty - Moddin.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephenfung.net/the-latest-casualty-moddinnet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/the-latest-casualty-moddinnet/</link>
	<description>The Personal Yakkety Yakkings of an Internet Entrepreneur</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/the-latest-casualty-moddinnet/comment-page-1/#comment-11118</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenfung.net/the-latest-casualty-moddinnet/#comment-11118</guid>
		<description>We deal with Tribal Fusion and Vibrant Media for our network advertising.  We also have access to the Shopping.com network.  All three have minimum qualifiers that most smaller sites don't meet.  

Because Futurelooks is a veteran of all three, its easy to get other sites that I own into those networks under Futurelooks.  On top of that, we don't just get the "Standard" offer that sites would get as new publishers.  Advertisers tend to advertise with sites that have a track record, and as a result, I have a bit more bargaining power when I feel I need a raise from any of them.  

For example, this blog actually runs Vibrant Media IntelliTXT.  There aren't many blogs that get to run that all on their own.  It's because of the relationship I've built with the VibrantMedia through Futurelooks that has made this so.  I also run Shopping.com here, again through the relationship with Futurelooks.  In fact, all my sites run all the programs, even though they would never qualify on their own.

In addition to those programs, I often sell direct advertising over the network of sites.  When I have a lead that buys advertising on Futurelooks, I can immediately show them one or two more sites that would meet their needs and complete their advertising mix, making it a one stop shop.

I think one Dot Com Mogul put it best when he said "Big Sites Rule.  Small Sites Drool". However pretentious and unfair that may sound, it is often the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We deal with Tribal Fusion and Vibrant Media for our network advertising.  We also have access to the Shopping.com network.  All three have minimum qualifiers that most smaller sites don&#8217;t meet.  </p>
<p>Because Futurelooks is a veteran of all three, its easy to get other sites that I own into those networks under Futurelooks.  On top of that, we don&#8217;t just get the &#8220;Standard&#8221; offer that sites would get as new publishers.  Advertisers tend to advertise with sites that have a track record, and as a result, I have a bit more bargaining power when I feel I need a raise from any of them.  </p>
<p>For example, this blog actually runs Vibrant Media IntelliTXT.  There aren&#8217;t many blogs that get to run that all on their own.  It&#8217;s because of the relationship I&#8217;ve built with the VibrantMedia through Futurelooks that has made this so.  I also run Shopping.com here, again through the relationship with Futurelooks.  In fact, all my sites run all the programs, even though they would never qualify on their own.</p>
<p>In addition to those programs, I often sell direct advertising over the network of sites.  When I have a lead that buys advertising on Futurelooks, I can immediately show them one or two more sites that would meet their needs and complete their advertising mix, making it a one stop shop.</p>
<p>I think one Dot Com Mogul put it best when he said &#8220;Big Sites Rule.  Small Sites Drool&#8221;. However pretentious and unfair that may sound, it is often the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secure Hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/the-latest-casualty-moddinnet/comment-page-1/#comment-11117</link>
		<dc:creator>Secure Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenfung.net/the-latest-casualty-moddinnet/#comment-11117</guid>
		<description>Good leadership - I agree.

'programs that Futurelooks has' - what are they, if I may ask?

Regards,
Richard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good leadership - I agree.</p>
<p>&#8216;programs that Futurelooks has&#8217; - what are they, if I may ask?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Richard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/the-latest-casualty-moddinnet/comment-page-1/#comment-11116</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenfung.net/the-latest-casualty-moddinnet/#comment-11116</guid>
		<description>That's an easy one.  I'm just not the right fit for this site and focus.

I'd need to be passionate about the content that it produces. Because I'm not into modding, the content team would see that and I can't sell anything that I'm not passionate about. I just wouldn't be able to provide the leadership and support that team would need because I'd have my attention on Futurelooks et al.

There would be a lot of clean up to do as well.  The site design needs to be nuked, and would need to be rebranded so that the suppliers are seeing a new face and that "new site" they were expecting to fulfill that initial promise. Although it would make some money with a little Google tweak here and access to the programs that Futurelooks has, it would also take some money to get the work done. Spending the money is not a problem, but I don't typically spend money on things I don't want to do.

If they could find someone that could sell and market that so happened to be passionate about modding, they could get that site going again.  It's all in the leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an easy one.  I&#8217;m just not the right fit for this site and focus.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d need to be passionate about the content that it produces. Because I&#8217;m not into modding, the content team would see that and I can&#8217;t sell anything that I&#8217;m not passionate about. I just wouldn&#8217;t be able to provide the leadership and support that team would need because I&#8217;d have my attention on Futurelooks et al.</p>
<p>There would be a lot of clean up to do as well.  The site design needs to be nuked, and would need to be rebranded so that the suppliers are seeing a new face and that &#8220;new site&#8221; they were expecting to fulfill that initial promise. Although it would make some money with a little Google tweak here and access to the programs that Futurelooks has, it would also take some money to get the work done. Spending the money is not a problem, but I don&#8217;t typically spend money on things I don&#8217;t want to do.</p>
<p>If they could find someone that could sell and market that so happened to be passionate about modding, they could get that site going again.  It&#8217;s all in the leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secure Hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/the-latest-casualty-moddinnet/comment-page-1/#comment-11112</link>
		<dc:creator>Secure Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenfung.net/the-latest-casualty-moddinnet/#comment-11112</guid>
		<description>Stephen, why don't you take over the sites and users?  Seems like you know what needs to be done to make the sites work.

Regards,
Richard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, why don&#8217;t you take over the sites and users?  Seems like you know what needs to be done to make the sites work.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Richard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/the-latest-casualty-moddinnet/comment-page-1/#comment-11097</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenfung.net/the-latest-casualty-moddinnet/#comment-11097</guid>
		<description>I hate to say it, but it looks more like they didn't know how to run a business at all.  You could have all the talent and knowledge in the world, but if you can't sell it, that's it.  Game over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to say it, but it looks more like they didn&#8217;t know how to run a business at all.  You could have all the talent and knowledge in the world, but if you can&#8217;t sell it, that&#8217;s it.  Game over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
