<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ONTOK - Not So Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephenfung.net/ontok-not-so-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/ontok-not-so-good/</link>
	<description>The Personal Yakkety Yakkings of an Internet Entrepreneur</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/ontok-not-so-good/#comment-3499</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenfung.net/ontok-not-so-good/#comment-3499</guid>
		<description>Since removing the ONTOK code, my unique visitors doubled.  My Google Adsense revenue is finally seeing triple digits.  Same with Shopping.com.  I hate to say it, but the performance issues caused by the ONTOK code, after seeing the affect of removing it, makes it a program that is a bit of a site killer.  I gave it a good try, and in the end, I think it's goodbye forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since removing the ONTOK code, my unique visitors doubled.  My Google Adsense revenue is finally seeing triple digits.  Same with Shopping.com.  I hate to say it, but the performance issues caused by the ONTOK code, after seeing the affect of removing it, makes it a program that is a bit of a site killer.  I gave it a good try, and in the end, I think it&#8217;s goodbye forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sourabh niyogi</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/ontok-not-so-good/#comment-3423</link>
		<dc:creator>sourabh niyogi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 05:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenfung.net/ontok-not-so-good/#comment-3423</guid>
		<description>We are very sorry to have been responsible for the slowdown in your site, which we are taking very seriously and of course apologize for.   We have been running our server farm at Aplus.net and they have not been responsive enough to address DOS attacks, especially on our load balancer with them, which is *supposed* to be for fault tolerance-- as such we are moving to a 2 datacenter setup to address the problems you faced.   Again, very sorry to have you leave because of this, but we are listening -- 

regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are very sorry to have been responsible for the slowdown in your site, which we are taking very seriously and of course apologize for.   We have been running our server farm at Aplus.net and they have not been responsive enough to address DOS attacks, especially on our load balancer with them, which is *supposed* to be for fault tolerance&#8211; as such we are moving to a 2 datacenter setup to address the problems you faced.   Again, very sorry to have you leave because of this, but we are listening &#8212; </p>
<p>regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
