<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dine Out Vancouver 2008 &#8211; The Boathouse Port Moody</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephenfung.net/dine-out-vancouver-2008-the-boathouse-port-moody/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/dine-out-vancouver-2008-the-boathouse-port-moody/</link>
	<description>The Personal Yakkety Yakkings of an Internet Entrepreneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:30:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dine Out Vancouver 2008 - FigMint Restaurant &#38; Lounge &#124; Stephen Fung DOT NET</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/dine-out-vancouver-2008-the-boathouse-port-moody/comment-page-1/#comment-15005</link>
		<dc:creator>Dine Out Vancouver 2008 - FigMint Restaurant &#38; Lounge &#124; Stephen Fung DOT NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 05:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenfung.net/dine-out-vancouver-2008-the-boathouse-port-moody/#comment-15005</guid>
		<description>[...] so I lied in my last Dine Out Review :P  My Port Moody Boathouse Review will not be my only Dine Out Vancouver 2008 review. This one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so I lied in my last Dine Out Review :P  My Port Moody Boathouse Review will not be my only Dine Out Vancouver 2008 review. This one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avoiding The Flash for Better Looking Pictures&#8230; &#124; Stephen Fung DOT NET</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/dine-out-vancouver-2008-the-boathouse-port-moody/comment-page-1/#comment-14952</link>
		<dc:creator>Avoiding The Flash for Better Looking Pictures&#8230; &#124; Stephen Fung DOT NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenfung.net/dine-out-vancouver-2008-the-boathouse-port-moody/#comment-14952</guid>
		<description>[...] my last outing with my point and shoot Canon SD850is, I took some pictures that I wasn&#8217;t quite happy with. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my last outing with my point and shoot Canon SD850is, I took some pictures that I wasn&#8217;t quite happy with. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/dine-out-vancouver-2008-the-boathouse-port-moody/comment-page-1/#comment-14949</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenfung.net/dine-out-vancouver-2008-the-boathouse-port-moody/#comment-14949</guid>
		<description>Tyler! You should really know better than that!

They make flash units to produce different lighting effects or illuminate areas that cannot be captured with a combination of ISO, Shutter Speed, and Aperture. A quick search of most articles about taking pictures of food by people that are true camera geeks (not us) say to &quot;avoid flash&quot; as it creates food that &quot;looks greasy and sweaty&quot; or ultimately not very realistic looking. Not very appetizing huh? Does anyone ever want to eat the fake sushi in the window?

Hail almighty Google...

http://www.google.com/search?q=Food+Photography+Flash&amp;rls=com.microsoft:*&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;startIndex=&amp;startPage=1

Having said that, there are cases where flash is essential because there is no way to see anything without it. However, one more thing that I did not consider with the pictures I took was the use of exposure compensation. With exposure compensation, I could bump it up to +1 and back the ISO to 400 to get rid of a lot of the noise. I&#039;m guestimating that my shutter speed would be at 1 second, but I would be able to have a very good naturally lit shot without the use of a flash. You&#039;d just have to hold the camera still for 1 second.

The advantage of this would be that I would have a shot that was not blown out in any part of the picture. If you look at any of my older food shots (or any of John&#039;s shots, past and present) there is an overexposed quadrant on every photo. However, having said that, unexposure is also bad; both of which create quadrants of information that can no longer be retrieved no matter how you manipulate it in Photoshop. I&#039;m going to do a few shots in crappy light with flash, no flash, then no flash with exposure compensation and post them up as a comparison in a bit.

PS: The black bits are chives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler! You should really know better than that!</p>
<p>They make flash units to produce different lighting effects or illuminate areas that cannot be captured with a combination of ISO, Shutter Speed, and Aperture. A quick search of most articles about taking pictures of food by people that are true camera geeks (not us) say to &#8220;avoid flash&#8221; as it creates food that &#8220;looks greasy and sweaty&#8221; or ultimately not very realistic looking. Not very appetizing huh? Does anyone ever want to eat the fake sushi in the window?</p>
<p>Hail almighty Google&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=Food+Photography+Flash&amp;rls=com.microsoft:" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=Food+Photography+Flash&amp;rls=com.microsoft:</a>*&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;startIndex=&amp;startPage=1</p>
<p>Having said that, there are cases where flash is essential because there is no way to see anything without it. However, one more thing that I did not consider with the pictures I took was the use of exposure compensation. With exposure compensation, I could bump it up to +1 and back the ISO to 400 to get rid of a lot of the noise. I&#8217;m guestimating that my shutter speed would be at 1 second, but I would be able to have a very good naturally lit shot without the use of a flash. You&#8217;d just have to hold the camera still for 1 second.</p>
<p>The advantage of this would be that I would have a shot that was not blown out in any part of the picture. If you look at any of my older food shots (or any of John&#8217;s shots, past and present) there is an overexposed quadrant on every photo. However, having said that, unexposure is also bad; both of which create quadrants of information that can no longer be retrieved no matter how you manipulate it in Photoshop. I&#8217;m going to do a few shots in crappy light with flash, no flash, then no flash with exposure compensation and post them up as a comparison in a bit.</p>
<p>PS: The black bits are chives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/dine-out-vancouver-2008-the-boathouse-port-moody/comment-page-1/#comment-14946</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenfung.net/dine-out-vancouver-2008-the-boathouse-port-moody/#comment-14946</guid>
		<description>haha i know people like that. They hate using a flash in public because they don&#039;t want people looking at them. I care not! lol

Stephen if flashes weren&#039;t supposed to be used why do they make flash units then? Reminds me, I want to pick up a bounce flash one day.

I can appreciate the fact that you wish not to use a flash to get a more natural light type shot but... when you&#039;re shooting food shouldn&#039;t you be trying showing off its texture, colours etc?

What is that black stuff on the food? lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha i know people like that. They hate using a flash in public because they don&#8217;t want people looking at them. I care not! lol</p>
<p>Stephen if flashes weren&#8217;t supposed to be used why do they make flash units then? Reminds me, I want to pick up a bounce flash one day.</p>
<p>I can appreciate the fact that you wish not to use a flash to get a more natural light type shot but&#8230; when you&#8217;re shooting food shouldn&#8217;t you be trying showing off its texture, colours etc?</p>
<p>What is that black stuff on the food? lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Chow</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfung.net/dine-out-vancouver-2008-the-boathouse-port-moody/comment-page-1/#comment-14940</link>
		<dc:creator>John Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenfung.net/dine-out-vancouver-2008-the-boathouse-port-moody/#comment-14940</guid>
		<description>Admit it, you&#039;re just scare to use the flash because you don&#039;t want other dinners giving you strange looks! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admit it, you&#8217;re just scare to use the flash because you don&#8217;t want other dinners giving you strange looks! <img src='http://www.stephenfung.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
